Update from WELL Labs (Since Nov 23)
Key points:
1. Launch of the Green Rural Economy as a concept and platform
We co-hosted a closed room convening with Rainmatter and Climate Rise Alliance on January 23rd and 24th. The objective of the convening was two-fold: to broaden our horizons on rural economies beyond food and fodder, and to launch our design prototype and receive feedback from the attendees.
Based on feedback from our convening partners, we decided to alter our initiative identity to reflect a more aspirational vision, one that is about enhanced livelihoods and opportunities, and goes beyond food and fodder.
This is the rationale behind our new name: Green Rural Economy.
The event saw the participation of representatives from organisations such as PRADAN, BRLF, RCRC, Gram Vikas, Industree Foundation, Buzz Women, and others. Social entrepreneurs such as Jaideep Bansal from GHE, Manisha Kairaly from Arugu and Trupti Doshi from Auroma Architects shared their journey with the audience - highlighting the need to merge local aspiration with climate-centric innovations.
During this convening, we presented a Design prototype by Platform Commons and the First MVP by T4G , receiving valuable feedback from both knowledge contributors and users, such as:
- On classifying resources: Resources need to be classified by agro-ecological regions since this is a determinant of which solutions are relevant for the user. If the user is able to set their own context as a filter, that would be best.
- On formats for resources and playbooks: Standardisation of playbooks is required. A summary of what the resource is about and what purpose it serves for the user should be visible upfront.
- On type of content: There should be more video content, case studies and success stories as people respond best to these. A video summary of the end result of the playbook/intervention would also be very useful.
- On ensuring attribution: Attribution emerged as a concern among the partners. Mechanisms to ensure attribution as well as provide user related stats to authors / contributors can build trust.
- On trainer information linked to playbooks: Information about trainers who can provide hand holding should be concurrently available with playbooks. Levels of trainers can enable users to discern the expertise & relevance for the intended training purpose.
- On vendors and provision of O&M: Discovery of local and affordable vendors is a pain point, resulting in outreach to out-of-state vendors.There was a need for such vendors to provide training on maintenance and repair of machinery/ products as most of the vendors do not provide servicing to far flung locales.
Read more here.
2. Working groups with DASRA
At the close of the GRE Launch, the organisations in attendance committed to working together to build out domains of the platform and expand it based on their experience. Over the course of the next 3 months we aim to work with each of these partners to -
- Map out the domain landscape
- Develop standardised formats for playbooks to share their domainâs knowledge
- Consolidate & curate the knowledge outputs from the respective organisations for dissemination on the platform
- Consolidate directories of trainers/ service providers/ champion farmers etc that can enable implementation of solutions.
Following the launch, we have been working closely with ClimateRise Alliance to explore synergies to attain these shared objectives.
3. Go-to-market GRE
- GRE Clinics
The hypothesis we tested through the GRE clinics is: , CSOs trying to implement a new intervention (request) have a lot of operational and technical questions but donât have access to experts (resource) who can answer these questions. And by bringing together two or more such CSOs in virtual call, âclinicâ, , we can facilitate exchange of knowledge and collaboration between them. To test this hypothesis, we conducted clinics where we brought together the knowledge seekers and knowledge providers into a meeting space and had organic conversations. We experimented with different formats and learnt the importance of each format in a given circumstance. The hypothesis was validated and found to be true. As we continue with the Clinics and extend into Field schools (offline training sessions with experts) the learnings from the initial set of clinics are documented here.
- Playbook Webinars
The hypothesis we tested through the playbooks webinars is, CSOs have resources on how to implement different solutions on the ground. If we built their capacity to convert these resources into standardised playbook formats, the knowledge is available to a larger audience. We conducted a couple of webinars to experiment with a low-touch model for creating playbooks with partners. Field executives with expertise in various themes from our partner PRADANâs field office and experts from two CSOs created five playbooks in this manner. Our major learning from conducting these webinars was that experts find this to be a useful process to capture their knowledge for other practitioners, as long as they have some hand holding from us for filling out the template.
- We have also developed a playbooks form to capture response to a specific question, based on the playbooks structure developed over multiple iterations. On circulating this form around for further feedback with partner organisations, we have been gathering feedback and evolving further versions.
4. Building a Service interface for the ecosystem
The GRE team has designed a request capture form to collect requests for help from various organisations in the sector that are then matched with relevant playbooks, service directories, and experts to facilitate solutioning.
One of the shifts we envision with the adoption of the GRE platform is from âbuilding from scratchâ to assembling solutions in the social sector. In order to do so, we believe we need to create a âservices interfaceâ - a way for CSOs to offer services in other landscapes to organisations that need it. This interface, largely prevalent in the technology & services industry, is essentially a means of interacting with the organisationâs donor, customer or users to deliver services.
We are currently designing this layer into the existing GRE roadmap & upcoming versions. We are in the process of onboarding the product & service offerings of our partners and relevant organisations - in that regard, we are developing forms across the different livelihood sectors that can be circulated to seamlessly gather this information.
Vendor and Services forms for various offerings are coming together.
The GRE platform would need to cater to very specific types of vendors besides those that are already available on other platforms. While we have multiple platforms for selling produce, there are no platforms that enable the selling of seeds. Here is the first draft of a form to onboard heirloom varieties, which could be sold through the platform. Seed vendors form. Another common request with GRE is that of processing machines for various livelihoods. The Processing Machine Vendors can onboard their products here, which is quite similar to the Solution Portal by Selco, and we look forward to evolving this with them.
In order to better capture trainer or capacity building services we have a Trainer Onboarding Form for experts, trainers and consultants to sign up and offer their services through the GRE platform. While some services are common to multiple thematics, there are some that are specific such services related to Solid Waste Management. As we iterate further, we are hoping to develop a host of ways to capture specific services that can be offered from multiple themes.